From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,16222f725bc81dfe
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Optimizing with gnat
Date: 1996/07/05
Message-ID: <dewar.836572058@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 164182038
references: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960704180428.1845A-100000@grunge.ee.ubc.ca>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Fernando said

"PD. Sorry for the lenght of the message, but I don't know which amount of
information is necessary... :-)"

In fact the full information *is* absolutely necessary (including full
sources, version of GNAT you are using, and machine/system you are 
using, as well as an exact description  of what happened). Your bug
report is just fine, but it needs to go to report@gnat.com for us to
look at it at ACT, we don't take bug reports directly from CLA.