From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,20b04d47a7bf2be2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: GNAT: Storage size? Date: 1996/07/04 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 163818677 references: <4rfrqa$6d0@rigel.rz.uni-ulm.de> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-07-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Joerg said "I am doing some matrix diagonalization using Ada-95 for the big frame of my programs and Fortran-77 for most of the matrix routines. Currently I am working under HP UX 9.05 (we're upgrading to 10.10 during the next months, I hope...). Since my matrices become quite large (at the moment 900x900 fortran double precision) I encountered a problem with GNAT. I think there is a simple solution to the problem, but have no idea were to look for it:" Without the slightest idea of what you are doing in detail, neither do we (have any idea where to look for it). It's possible you are exceeding stack limits, but without sample source code it is impossible to guess what might be wrong. Try to narrow down a simple example of something that does not work, and send it along to report@gnat.com. This might be a bug in GNAT, but I doubt it, it is unlikely that there is a bug selectively affecting large arrays, but anyway, without source, we cannot do anything more.