From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,99ab4bb580fc34cd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Q: access to subprogram
Date: 1996/07/03
Message-ID: <dewar.836436496@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 163651019
references: <4rb9dp$qe6@news1.delphi.com> <Dtxu2p.97F@world.std.com>
 <JSA.96Jul2221357@organon.com> <4re2ng$t7u@wdl1.wdl.loral.com>
 <DtzAFG.54z@world.std.com>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


OOps, Bob Duff and I are using downward/upward exactly opposite in our
posts on closures, I think Bob is right, and I was wrong. Downward is
the easy one, Upward is the hard one (which has to save parameter
instances).