From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6a9844368dd0a842
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: *separate* keyword and *separate* compilation with Gnat?
Date: 1996/07/03
Message-ID: <dewar.836413429@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 164009820
references: <31D95D93.28D8D15B@jinx.sckans.edu>
 <4rckva$dj1@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <31DA6C14.55B6A8FD@jinx.sckans.edu>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


David Morton said

"I'm at a loss for words"

reacting to some incorrect guesses as to his misunderstanding of how
GNAT handles subunits.

This is probably a good time to remind everyone to always send copies of
questions like this to report@gnat.com. Simple straightforward questions
like this will almost always be answered quickly, and unlike comp.lang.ada,
email to report@gnat.com reaches a group of people who do know GNAT pretty
well, and can provide the right answers reliably.

There are of course a fair number of people reading CLA who know GNAT well,
so it is certainly reasonable to post here, but you always have to remember
that it is sometimes not so easy to tell from people's posts what they know
and what they don't know :-)