From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f891f,9d58048b8113c00f X-Google-Attributes: gidf891f,public X-Google-Thread: 10cc59,9d58048b8113c00f X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc59,public X-Google-Thread: 101deb,b20bb06b63f6e65 X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,2e71cf22768a124d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,9d58048b8113c00f X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: next "big" language?? (disagree) Date: 1996/06/28 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 162815473 references: <4q707h$1r2@krusty.irvine.com> <4r19nc$b3h@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-06-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Fergus asked: "Why would anyone want this model?" referring to the non-intrusive model of assert, where putting in asserts does not affect the rest of the generated code (the one I noted was hard to define). Seems self-explanatory to me -- I am not saying that it is the preferable semantics, but it is easy to understand why people want this, they want to be able to turn assertions on and off without affecting the behavior of the code.