From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,af42f89f2159f3b6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: A note on GNAT 3.05 performance
Date: 1996/06/22
Message-ID: <dewar.835454848@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 162240293
references: <dewar.835245019@schonberg> <4qeubm$8th@linus.mitre.org>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-06-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Michael Brenner says

"Is this why djgpp DOS interrupts don't work any more...because
the structure containing the registers is a record type?"

Please report the behavior you are seeing, with an exact example to
report@gnat.com. The folks maintaining the DOS port at ACT do not
read CLA.

Sorry to sound like a broken record on this, but it seems a continual
problem that people post GNAT reports to CLA without copying to 
report@gnat.com. Most of the people at ACT have abandoned reading CLA
(too high a noise to signal ratio), and I don't get on every day
necessarily any more (and I certainly do not forward bug reports
from CLA, since there is no simple way to do that for me while
retaining proper tracking headers, subject lines etc.)