From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e29c511c2b08561c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered?
Date: 1996/06/09
Message-ID: <dewar.834341377@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 159314600
references: <4mq7mg$8hs@jake.probe.net>
 <bell-0306960825410001@rmbell.fw.hac.com> <4peu0v$rfq@news15.erols.com>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-06-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Mike, the policy that Ada must be used for DoD development has not changed.
It is of course under constant review to make sure that it is applied
appropriately, but there is no change in policy that would affect your
project at the current time. The understanding that there has been such
a change is just plain wrong.