From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d30fbbf6343a12e1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Gnat-3.04 source; builtin_setjmp/builtin_longjmp
Date: 1996/06/08
Message-ID: <dewar.834271310@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 159222423
references: <1996Jun6.142139.25487@relay.nswc.navy.mil>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
keywords: GNAT
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-06-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


David Mann said

"Has anyone found that they cannot built GNAT-3.04 from source because
the target platform does not support the routines 'builtin_setjmp'
and 'builtin_lonjmp'.  If so, are they any ideas on what some
replacement routines (in C I presume) would look like?
"

Well I trust you saw my post replying on this. One thing to realize is
that built-in means built-in, i.e. built into the C compiler, there
are no replacement routines in C or any other language for that matter.
Builtin routines in GCC are like intrinsic routines in Ada 95.