From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f891f,9d58048b8113c00f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf891f,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,9d58048b8113c00f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 10261c,2e71cf22768a124d
X-Google-Attributes: gid10261c,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2e71cf22768a124d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: next "big" language?? (disagree)
Date: 1996/06/07
Message-ID: <dewar.834154532@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 159058651
references: <4p0fdd$4ml@news.atlantic.net>
 <4p1l65$35qi@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
 <Pine.A32.3.91.960604122744.95668B-100000@green.weeg.uiowa.edu>
 <4p23oe$3f1e@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
 <Pine.A32.3.91.960604222158.29674A-100000@black.weeg.uiowa.edu>
 <4p3hpk$idl@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal.misc,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-06-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


">  Really?  Then where did I hear the complaint about every Ada programmer
>using a different language?  I will admit that as I have not been exposed
>to the language in depth, my statements are less accusations and more
>questions.  I'm quite happy to be corrected.  FWIW I'm very taken by
>Miranda, although I do wish they'd port it to something besides Unix."

If Miranda seems interesting, take a closer look at Haskel, which is widely
available, and I think represents a much more comperhensive approach to
the issue of applicative lazy semantics.