From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea4f04ec8d41f5b7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada83 equivalents for Ada95
Date: 1996/06/03
Message-ID: <dewar.833832908@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 158287175
references: <md5:0CCFC2005521EA8746533FEB9AA03D75>
 		<31927190.35AA@csehp3.mdc.com> <Dr70x4.Drs@world.std.com>
 		<31A66DAA.7418@sud.ed.ray.com> <JSA.96May28171339@organon.com>
 <31ABFD4B.4DE@lmtas.lmco.com> <dewar.833587300@schonberg>
 <31B2B167.25E@lmtas.lmco.com>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-06-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


iKen Garlington said

"I also assume that this statement might hold true for other compiler vendors -
sufficient interest in VAX/VMS would cause them to generate a port. However,
I don't think this statement would necessarily be cause to announce multi-vendor
support of VAX/VMS just yet!"

The difference in the case of GNAT is that the additional work required is
relatively small, given the effort that will already have been put in to
create the VMS port for Alpha.