From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea4f04ec8d41f5b7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada83 equivalents for Ada95
Date: 1996/05/31
Message-ID: <dewar.833587300@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 157875340
references: <md5:0CCFC2005521EA8746533FEB9AA03D75>
 		<31927190.35AA@csehp3.mdc.com> <Dr70x4.Drs@world.std.com>
 		<31A66DAA.7418@sud.ed.ray.com> <JSA.96May28171339@organon.com>
 <31ABFD4B.4DE@lmtas.lmco.com>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-05-31T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Ken Garlington said

"Just as a clarification - the Gnat port will be to Alpha/VMS. As far
as I know, VAX/VMS will be "in the weeds" for an indefinite period."

This of course depends on customer interest in a VMS port for VAX. There
is a GCC port for VAX/VMS, and once the GNAT port for Alpha/VMS exists,
putting 2+2 together is certainly practical. So if you are interested in
a Vax/VMS port, let us know!

Robert Dewar
President, Ada Core Technologies