From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,66383f4b94d281e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada-95 Success Stories
Date: 1996/05/25
Message-ID: <dewar.833041095@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 156766439
references: <4o31vk$cba@news1.delphi.com> <dewar.832914923@schonberg>
 <31A5F514.2F1CF0FB@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-05-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"I'd have to agree whole-heartedly with that. I could take or leave tagged types,
but I'm awaiting the "valid" attribute with baited breath. Never will I fear
changing optimization levels again!"

The valid attribute is implemented in GNAT, and, as far we we know, and as
our tests indicate, works fine.