From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,15890893c0618a8a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: [Q] Tools for Ada Quality and Style [LONG] Date: 1996/05/02 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 152719211 references: <9604172134.AA27114@eight-ball> <4xenp57jj1.fsf@leibniz.enst-bretagne.fr> <4xwx2w8dn5.fsf_-_@leibniz.enst-bretagne.fr> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-05-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Duff said "One of the main benefits of Free Software is that you get the source code. But one of the main problems with Free Software is that you get the source code. [And end up wasting time hacking on it.]" The fact that you can write extensions to EMACS in LISP has nothing whatsoever to do with the source code being available. Any decent editor allows the programming of extensions, and from my view, the LISP used by EMACS is far more elegant and easy to learn than say the junky macros of Microsoft Word.