From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,c52c30d32b866eae X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,2ea02452876a15e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,c52c30d32b866eae X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Real OO Date: 1996/04/30 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 152354892 references: organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object Date: 1996-04-30T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Bob said "Well, words change their meaning, and get additional meanings. After all, think about an Italian chef admonishing us that "spaghetti" is really a kind of pasta, and the term shouldn't be evilly hijacked to talk about gotos. I've seen the term "spaghetti" used quite a few times to describe messy multiple inheritance patterns." Surely someone can come up with some colorful new image for messy code of this type. It needs an appropriate term. Calling it spaghetti coding might be unfair to spagehetti :-)