From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,42427d0d1bf647b1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Ada Core Technologies and Ada95 Standards Date: 1996/04/27 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 151687813 references: <00001a73+00002c20@msn.com> <315FD5C9.342F@lfwc.lockheed.com> <828474655.17825@assen.demon.co.uk> <829673790.5774@assen.demon.co.uk> <830205885.24190@assen.demon.co.uk> <317CB211.3DBA@lmtas.lmco.com> <3180C57E.630C@lmtas.lmco.com> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-04-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "It is the F-22 program's experience that, of the hundreds of change requests we as users have submitted to our compiler vendors, the majority have test cases which are both small and non-proprietary." I see no reason to think that the profile for the F-22 would be similar to that of a compier, but in fact I would probably say the same of GNAT, but 49% can be quite a lot of tests!