From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1bce3f54cf1cba1b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GNAT Executables: How low can you go?
Date: 1996/04/19
Message-ID: <dewar.829958638@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 150462332
references: <4kmq7a$egm@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl> <dewar.829400646@schonberg>
 <4l0o3s$hgt@utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl> <31742475.1CFBAE39@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
 <Pine.SUN.3.91.960417100245.1349B-100000@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl>
 <317688E9.2781E494@escmail.orl.mmc.com> <4l82j3$mob@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
 <3177D309.2F1CF0FB@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-04-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

T.E.D. said

"That wasn't my impression. My impression (I think supported by the
thread title of "How low can you go?") was that we were talking about
space for space's sake."

Exactly wrong, space for PERFORMANCE's sake, not space for SPACES's sake.
disk is cheap and getting cheaper all the time, people's time is more
expensive!