From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,42427d0d1bf647b1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Ada Core Technologies and Ada95 Standards Date: 1996/04/16 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 147755342 references: <00001a73+00002c20@msn.com> <828038680.5631@assen.demon.co.uk> <828127251.85@assen.demon.co.uk> <315FD5C9.342F@lfwc.lockheed.com> <3160EFBF.BF9@lfwc.lockheed.com> <31729101.3F83@lfwc.lockheed.com> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-04-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Ken said "> A comparison would be if 20 different vendors wrote completely different > F22 software, with different cockpit interfaces. Twenty sounds a little low, but that's close enough...." Are you really saying that the ENTIRE F22 software is duplicated by 20 vendors? That's hard to believe. Can you name the 20 vendors in this case. I am not talking about 20 vendors writing different pieces of the same system, but 20 COMPETELY SEPARATE versions of the entire program. Why on earth would the airforce do this (have 20 versions of the software written by different primes?)