From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac5c3bc59168d76 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Subprogram Renaming Date: 1996/04/11 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 147048194 references: <316BC3D6.14E7@csehp3.mdc.com> <4kjkg6$4m2@krusty.irvine.com> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-04-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Adam says "Just out of curiosity: package q is procedure j; end q; package body q is procedure k; procedure j renames k; end q; Are j'address and k'address equal? Is there anything in the RM that says one way or the other whether they must be equal?" The RM has nothing to say on this!