From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5992229ab824d8f7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Q: on redefinition of "=
Date: 1996/04/01
Message-ID: <dewar.828416284@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 145355462
references: <4jkj5sINN8d3@aleutian.cis.ohio-state.edu>
 <Dp6wAp.6w5.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
 <4jp05jINNqo6@snoopy.cis.ohio-state.edu>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-04-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Anyway, in the design I'm currently working with all types must
support automatic initialization and finalization (and thus are
controlled types)"

This sounds truly awful. I wonder if whoever devised this approach has
any idea how much overhead this approach introduces, not to mention
complexity in the generated code.