From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e60fe41dcabc5f5d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.03 for OS/2
Date: 1996/04/01
Message-ID: <dewar.828397937@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 145337716
references: <199604010708.IAA30416@jerry.rb.icl.co.uk>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-04-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"are you sure that you "don't need more donations"? - I think this
would be a nice thing to continue, though obviously the idea of ACT
matching all donations is unfair from your point of view, perhaps if
it catches on and enough donations are made then ACT would not have
to match donations. Sorry just my random thoughts."

well we don't *need* any more donations, and I don't want to be int
the business of actively soliciting such donations. It is not so
much the concern of ACT matching that concerns me, I just don't
like to be begging for money (too much like PBS :-)

However, the point is that if you want to contribute to this, we
certainly will accept the donations and put them to good use.
email me for any more details.