From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d23a9c52d1958b6a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Problem to dramatize packed-array/rep-clause difficulties
Date: 1996/03/27
Message-ID: <dewar.827960355@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 144562275
references: <4jaun6$st6@news2.delphi.com>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-03-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

tmoran said

"Assume since bits are specified in Intel order that bytes are also, ie,
that the low order bit of the second byte is in fact the highest order
bit of the first Natural9 value, rather than its lowest order bit."

Actually the ranges specified here are quite endian-neutral.

This set of rep clauses certainly works fine on GNAT, should work on
all versions of GNAT -- it's a bug (send it in to report@gnat.com)
if it doesn't, but it works fine for me!