From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,67c50b972ca3b532
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Realtime Ada Conferences
Date: 1996/03/26
Message-ID: <dewar.827898198@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 144403174
references: <4j9j9f$620@hacgate2.hac.com>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-03-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jeff said

"Ada 95 does not really solve the realtime problem because
vendors are not forced to deliver the Ada 95 realtime
extensions."

I think this is a bogus worry. Sure some compiler intened only as a COBOL
replacement might implement the info systems annex and not the rt annex,
but any compiler even vaguely intended for the rt market will have to
implement the RT annex, the market will ensure this much more effectively
than any rule in the standard!