From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,16e3a8dd4f3ab3f3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Elaboration order
Date: 1996/03/18
Message-ID: <dewar.827204425@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 143190048
references: <314701A1.469D@lfwc.lockheed.com> <Do8JDv.A2v@world.std.com>
 	<31494143.3825@lfwc.lockheed.com> <DoBI9D.KH6@world.std.com>
 <EACHUS.96Mar18143219@spectre.mitre.org>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-03-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"   That's quite an understatement.  To demonstrate the problem with
the Ada 80 rule I wrote a little program that any Ada 80 compiler must
compile without error if Format's Last Theorem was true, and which
must be rejected if it was false."

First, I love the typo (Format for Fermat) :-)

But another comment, this must mean that yoru program should compile
without error, as we now know :-)