From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,120a40ece2c29ff2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: PVM, MPI, Ada?
Date: 1996/02/21
Message-ID: <dewar.824949011@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 140618027
references: <4gdbvk$81o@dfw.dfw.net> <4xvil0oear.fsf@boole.enst-bretagne.fr>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-02-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dave Weller said

"GNAT = GNAT is Not an Ada Translator"

Laurent Guerby said:

"Hum, GNAT = the GNU Ada 95 compiler ;-)"

Laurent, you missed the point, Dave was suggesting a new retronym for
GNAT. Another suggestion was "Great New Ada Technology" (from Tom Griest).
But I am afraid your entry does not fit the rules :-)