From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,9ac62ca34a465706
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ac62ca34a465706
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: on OO differnces between Ada95 and C++
Date: 1996/02/21
Message-ID: <dewar.824905880@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 140391886
references: <4gbq7q$g08@qualcomm.com> <3129F185.41C6@Rational.COM>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++
Date: 1996-02-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In Jerome's list, the two entries:

- .C files may be compiled in any order

- .h files are not compiled


As GNAT shows, there is no need to have a specific order of compilation
for Ada files, and GNAT does not require specs to be explicitly copiled
(although it permits it, which is the way I would state the advantage).