From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b388e4a11c35fe6a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,b388e4a11c35fe6a X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 115aec,b388e4a11c35fe6a X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: ADA to C converter, the dream ? Date: 1996/02/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 139874627 references: <4fn8bv$6d1@news.be.innet.net> <3121E777.304D@afit.af.mil> <3123749C.53AB@escmail.orl.mmc.com> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.realtime Date: 1996-02-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: T.E.D. says "I feel the momentum for changing Gnat's name building..." Well, we don't :-) We have no intention of changing the name. And in any case, to think that a mere name change will prevent people having misconceptions is, I am afraid, unrealistic :-) Also, we prefer to still capitalize it as GNAT :-) We discussed having a competition to determine the best after the fact acronym for GNAT (so far we are rather partial to the "Great New Ada Technology" suggestion :-)