From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,b388e4a11c35fe6a
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b388e4a11c35fe6a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,b388e4a11c35fe6a
X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: ADA to C converter, the dream ?
Date: 1996/02/17
Message-ID: <dewar.824578887@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 139874587
references: <4fn8bv$6d1@news.be.innet.net> <tgmDMoBMy.E94@netcom.com>
 <3121E777.304D@afit.af.mil>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.realtime
Date: 1996-02-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Rusty says

"Why don't you use the gnat (Ada 95) compiler.  It is a front end to the
gcc compiler.  Perhaps there is a switch to generate C code??"

And perhaps there is not, there is also no switch to generate Fortran,
Algol or natural language Chinese (none of which are any less likely
than C, given that in no sense does GNAT translate into C :-)