From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f07b9c63c348974b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1008e3,f07b9c63c348974b X-Google-Attributes: gid1008e3,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: A comparison of Ada and Modula 3 Date: 1996/02/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 139888489 references: <4f48un$scs@nntpa.cb.att.com> <4flukd$82l@rational.rational.com> <4fu2ji$l76@beatty.slip.netcom.com> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-02-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Derek asked "How do the debuggers available for GNAT and SRC Modula-3 compare? What about debugging into calls to a foreign subsystem written in C or (shudder) C++?" gdb is very happy to deal with multi-language programs, it automaticaly switches its command interpretor personality to match the language you ar currently debugging (e.g. you type a = b if you are debugging an Ada unit, and (a == b) if you are debugging a C unit.