From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2abd26ae990a7289 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Record rep-clauses Date: 1996/01/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 134759847 references: <30F1418B.33CB@kiemw.ericsson.se> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-01-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Magnus asked: >I believe I have seen a paper (or article) about how to best write >record-rep clauses when you need to port your software between little- >and big-endian system but I don't know where! This is too vague, these endian questions can be very confusing, and there are at least three quite different problems that the above question might be referring to. Magnus, can you be very precise in exactly what you are trying to do, and we will try to help!