From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6810b109c5e47f58
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: GNAT going backwards?
Date: 1995/04/21
Message-ID: <dewar.798492015@gnat>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 101370107
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1995-04-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I don't normally post bug details on GNAT to CLA, but since Chuck Ebbert 
posted the original report to CLA, it seemed appropriate to respond. Chuck
had identified a regression in GNAT on April 18th (which we filed as
[1618-003]). It was a small glitch with formal packages. It is now fixed
in GNAT version 2.05, which we hope to release sometime next week. 
Furthermore, as is normally the case, this test now goes into our standard
regression suite which we run every night, and so that particular bug 
should stay squelched :-)

As always, regressions are the nastiest kind of rodent life found infesting
GNAT, and we appreciate people reporting them.