From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,97482af7429a6a62
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,97482af7429a6a62
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d15b,97482af7429a6a62
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d15b,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Language Efficiency
Date: 1995/04/07
Message-ID: <dewar.797310004@gnat>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 100069361
references: <3lmt64$stt@dplanet.p2k.cbis.com> <3lrrqk$kbj@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
 <3ls7u0$3v1@stc06.ctd.ornl.gov>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.cobol
Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Please substantiate the "heresy" that different languages make a big
difference in generated code efficiency.