From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cf34599caf2fa938
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GNAT function calling overhead
Date: 1995/04/07
Message-ID: <dewar.797290279@gnat>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 100070433
references: <3m0nv1$pv2@nef.ens.fr> <D6nA9u.Hq7@nntpa.cb.att.com>
 <3m3aia$7u9@stout.entertain.com>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Just to cut through some of the smoke here!

There will be no more funding for the GNAT project per se from the 
government after the contract termination at the end of June. The
government may wish to establish support contracts with SGI, Labtek,
ACT or other organizations supporting GNAT, but that's a different
matter entirely. 

GNAT stands on its own feet after June 30th, and that seems quite
appropriate to me!