From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,319ef0454c7765d5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ? Date: 1995/04/07 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 100070430 references: <3ksv4s$f9e@news.uni-c.dk> <1995Mar28.115614.9511@eisner> <3ls5sb$nl8@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "Was there ever any other possible interpretation?" No of course not, but I want other to be clear on that. Sometimes people have heard us arge fiercely, e.g. in the ARG, and concluded that we must be in the mode of avoiding one another on the street :-) My favorite memory was one ARG meeting, where you got up and said "Ah yes, now that Robert has called my ideas 'incredible junk', I see I must be completely wrong :-)" (and yes, the smiley belongs *inside* the quotes here!)