From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e9ec140e4d84359f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: No multiple dispatch in Ada95?
Date: 1995/04/06
Message-ID: <dewar.797220733@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 100939440
references: <3lu8tp$eep@disunms.epfl.ch>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Well that's amusing! someone says it is a "really big goof" to leave out
multiple dispatching. Well I guess this is to be expected from a CLOS
refugee :-)

But just for the record, this was not some accidental oversight, it was
certainly discussed, and here was NO (as in ZERO) support for even
considering this additional complexification.

For those who don't know CLOS, if you are bored with the excessive simplicity
of the Ada OO model, this should be a good antidote :-)