From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d51051a623c1e2d0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Darel Cullen Subject: Re: decline of Ada? Date: 1996/11/25 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 200752666 distribution: world x-nntp-posting-host: djcull.demon.co.uk references: <3295E96C.62B0@lmtas.lmco.com> organization: my bedroom mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-11-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <5762ls$4qn@butch.lmsc.lockheed.com>, David Kristola spoke thus :- >In article 62B0@lmtas.lmco.com, Ken Garlington () >writes: > >> >>> 2) DoD Contractors will not build in Ada because you can't find >>> trained coders to work for 24K to 32K per year. You can in England :) (dollars or pounds) >>> But you can find "C" >>> coders. Therefore, if you want the contract, you cut the cost and >>> program it in "C". It really has very little to do with the language, >>> its advantages, or disadvantages. It has to do with dollars. appologies for replying to a reply to a reply to a reply, but i dont store much mail at home.. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Darel J. Cullen Software Engineer Email: Darel@djcull.demon.co.uk Url: http://www.djcull.demon.co.uk/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-