From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b413c7f1e3769865 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Any Ada in this? Or would Ada have helped Toyota save $2b?... Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:58:11 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <1f936af3-0fb7-48f1-8f37-f3a1c5ead2ed@m31g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <048f46b0-f201-400e-9a8e-ef8b31b6d8f1@u15g2000prd.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.173.244.146 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1265302691 13817 127.0.0.1 (4 Feb 2010 16:58:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: s12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.173.244.146; posting-account=g4n69woAAACHKbpceNrvOhHWViIbdQ9G User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.0.10, Ant.com Toolbar 1.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8889 Date: 2010-02-04T08:58:11-08:00 List-Id: On Feb 4, 4:14=A0pm, Adam Beneschan wrote: > On Feb 4, 4:47=A0am, Martin wrote: > > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8497471.stm > > > It's states that this is a software problem but doesn't give > > details...anyone know anything about this? > > (1) the linked article is mostly about flaws in the braking system, which= has > not yet cost Toyota anywhere near $2B; It's the figure quoted for lost revenue in the paragraph "Profits Surge". > (2) I can't find anywhere where > the article refers to a software problem (thus, I have no idea what > you mean by "[It] states that this is a software problem"); The original article headline mentioned software...but they've gone and changed it! Cheers -- Martin