From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,828d0f4bb0bf385 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!y13g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada transformations with MetaScribe? Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:37:09 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.75.149.163 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1236800259 12354 127.0.0.1 (11 Mar 2009 19:37:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y13g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.75.149.163; posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4044 Date: 2009-03-11T12:37:09-07:00 List-Id: On 10 mar, 23:50, Ivan Levashew wrote: > > I've got some success with GEMA. > > -- > If you want to get to the top, you have to start at the bottom I know it, and I've talked about Gema in a thread at comp.lang.ada two months ago. Any way, Gema and MetaScribe seems to be very different things : Gema is a preprocessor without any predefined syntax (it requires an external set of rules), and =93that's all=94 . While MetaScribe comes with a lot of formalisms and is clearly intended to deal with meta-datas (as far as I've understood).