From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b1994c62e4fe4518 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!n11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Yannick_Duch=EAne_Hibou57?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Will UML helps to document Ada sources ? Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:51:08 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <7cb964c8-497f-4d01-9cfa-fefd909b1bd8@q11g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <471cab23-d325-4b8a-b1ce-3e30badc9409@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <1979e3e3-2c50-4074-a05c-5b0937740aa2@k6g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <5b9b9b4a-02be-49e7-b603-87991f6e91d8@r27g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <532dfaa6-b59b-4945-9ce1-befa9d1174e6@v20g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.198.58.25 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1248990668 18630 127.0.0.1 (30 Jul 2009 21:51:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: n11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.198.58.25; posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7471 Date: 2009-07-30T14:51:08-07:00 List-Id: On 29 juil, 07:43, okellogg wrote: > That may be so but e.g. the UML Profile for CORBA does use the > "+"-inside-circle symbol for containmeint association. > That's where we got the idea from. Thanks for the explanation > You are using a relatively version (1.3.2) and this has been fixed. > I recommend using 1.5.8 or newer. I tried the one shipped with KDE for Windows > This is a further area where improvements were made since 1.3.2. Yes, but do not be too hard with yourself, as the job already done is already nice. > Yes, StarUML is great. > Too bad it is not being maintained or further developed. Right, the last developpement occured in 2005 and there will be no more from the original author (this is sure). The initial owner allow any one to update it or to provide commercial support for it (there is a special page with some links to some compagnies), but the source depends on some third partie materials, and further more, mostly old versions of these materials, which are not supported any more by DevExpress (the provider of these components)... and Delphi Pro is too much expensive. Well, ... By the way, a little side annouce : if anyone is interested in a native Windows validating editor for UML targeting Ada, this would be a project I would enjoy to start. For any license, providing I could get fund for it (the developpement), make me now (I'm seeking for interesting Ada related projects to work on at the time).