From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.176.2.174 with SMTP id 43mr2046900uah.1.1464074932560;
        Tue, 24 May 2016 00:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.157.1.4 with SMTP id 4mr28623otu.14.1464074932495; Tue, 24
 May 2016 00:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!88no5924719qga.1!news-out.google.com!f14ni157ita.0!nntp.google.com!q6no760136igz.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 00:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <45a79c44-754f-447f-91d1-b69778dbeaa1@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=83.34.249.176;
 posting-account=Zsf4jwoAAADEqwCydv835KU9-S3h_Y26
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.34.249.176
References: <d7d3f9d8-4514-4794-bfc9-b835e7a2eac4@googlegroups.com>
 <6784b2fe-96cf-46cb-b3a6-00a0e2f2bf16@googlegroups.com>
 <nhq8mf$a09$1@dont-email.me>
 <906d946c-b8a4-484b-864f-06ff2dfd8abc@googlegroups.com>
 <cca591b3-b5c3-47fd-9628-947814f59dc3@googlegroups.com>
 <5ef1bb51-2006-4069-a969-77fdfe5012cd@googlegroups.com>
 <5544d461-54c7-46aa-9f00-0e25035329db@googlegroups.com>
 <c50cd647-e696-4add-8c72-7fe94e2457a7@googlegroups.com>
 <45a79c44-754f-447f-91d1-b69778dbeaa1@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ddd78d1f-4414-4e19-b6b5-ada0d85d1999@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: ANN: Introducing AdaBase - Thick database bindings for Ada
From: jrmarino <dragonlace.cla@marino.st>
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:28:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30466
Date: 2016-05-24T00:28:52-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 at 12:03:37 AM UTC+2, Martin wrote:
> Indeed, but the original API didn't follow the common style, that was my =
point. And it's very easy to configure GNAT to check your coding style.
>=20

I have (and alway had) virtually every style switch set on.  You've mention=
ed GNAT twice, but I don't see that as having played any role here.  Gnat d=
oesn't balk on CamelCase or suffixed enumeration type elements under any se=
tting I'm aware of.  I see keyword casing, but not identifier casing switch=
es.