From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 5b1e799cdb,3ef3e78eacf6f938
X-Google-Attributes: gid5b1e799cdb,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.modula3,comp.programming
Subject: Re: Alternatives to C: ObjectPascal, Eiffel, Ada or Modula-3?
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <ddcc45e5-b027-458e-9fe8-1f3b72556b8c@a7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
References: <h3sln0$rhm$2@news.eternal-september.org>
 <7cf9peF2758tgU1@mid.individual.net>
	<1ac0d96f-9dfc-4bcb-abff-2f5cb1c5da8d@e4g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
	<87tz18bskg.fsf@galatea.local>
 <4a635fa9$0$31329$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.75.149.223
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1248030584 18831 127.0.0.1 (19 Jul 2009 19:09:44
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:09:44 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: a7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.75.149.223;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.eiffel:316 comp.lang.ada:7155
 comp.lang.modula3:42 comp.programming:11845
Date: 2009-07-19T12:09:44-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 19 juil, 20:02, Georg Bauhaus <see.reply...@maps.futureapps.de>
wrote:
> Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
> > Later, when you have a collection of proven algorithms, you may write
> > (still in Common Lisp, why reject a winning team?), a translator to
> > convert your algorithmic s-exps into the target language of your
> > choice, be it Ada, Pascal, C, Eiffel, Fortran, Haskell, Modula-2 or
> > Modula-3, whatever you need. =A0It's almost trivial to generate such
> > code from a DSL expressed in s-exps.
Oops, the previous was already about it