From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.107.150.18 with SMTP id y18mr15688431iod.107.1523186114036; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 04:15:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:590b:: with SMTP id t11-v6mr1855861oth.7.1523186113607; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 04:15:13 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!u184-v6no1355164ita.0!news-out.google.com!15-v6ni672itg.0!nntp.google.com!k65-v6no1339850ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 04:15:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <115d2e72-2b30-4ec0-b42f-52e9df2905d4@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.241.60.127; posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.241.60.127 References: <115d2e72-2b30-4ec0-b42f-52e9df2905d4@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: no, it can't be, there's no "with procedure instance_of_generic_procedure is new generic_procedure;" ? Impossible ! From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 11:15:13 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Bytes: 1611 X-Received-Body-CRC: 103752243 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51399 Date: 2018-04-08T04:15:13-07:00 List-Id: I understand your point, but there are special cases... namely Unchechecked_deallocation, unchecked_conversion. In the example above, I can't be sure the "Free" provided will be an effective deallocation procedure. Sure, I don't see that many other examples, in fact I see none, but other people COULD have found that useful. Well, that wouldn't have changed the world. I won't argue with that :-P