From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f23f789345652e5b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Users of the BON notation among Ada users ?
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:38:24 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <dd2b1470-f3a6-4f10-ae98-5701182f9b12@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <c06663c9-c55a-4721-8800-9d01b26902d2@d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
	<30be5a15-ed2e-4853-b9ba-f4ff2e770aa8@r36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.198.58.142
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1231839504 26436 127.0.0.1 (13 Jan 2009 09:38:24
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:38:24 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.198.58.142;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3256
Date: 2009-01-13T01:38:24-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 13 jan, 00:01, sjw <simon.j.wri...@mac.com> wrote:
> A quick look suggests that BON is roughly equivalent to the subset of
> UML which brings about 90% of the value.
I was looking for such a thing. As you seems to know about it, may I
ask you where can I find a consensual subset of UML ?

> Ragbag of notations so each person on the project can choose which
> subset to use (people have been known to think they had to use every
> UML feature: that way lies madness and bankruptcy).
So I'm not just an idiot (I feel a bit better now).