From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2dda499a002ec3c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-26 06:57:55 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: kcline@optelnow.net (Kevin Cline)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: rendez-vous underlying mechanism
Date: 26 Mar 2002 06:57:53 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <dcfe911f.0203260657.690d35b0@posting.google.com>
References: <a7n9qd$8kf$1@bcarh8ab.ca.nortel.com>
 <a7pk89$kj4$1@bcarh8ab.ca.nortel.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.219.81.150
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1017154675 11695 127.0.0.1 (26 Mar 2002 14:57:55
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Mar 2002 14:57:55 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21684
Date: 2002-03-26T14:57:55+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Bozo" <gri_nob@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<a7pk89$kj4$1@bcarh8ab.ca.nortel.com>...
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm sorry I wasn't clear enough.
> I don't use ADA at the moment but I was a brave ADA programmer once.
> I use C at the moment and I have a case where synchronous rendez-vous would
> be better that traditional asynchrounous intertask communications.
> 
> Does anyone have an idea how to implement that in C with semaphores for
> example ?

This depends on the underlying OS.  If you are using pthreads, 
then see the manual entry for pthread_cond_wait.