From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,345a8b767542016e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-17 19:52:37 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: kcline@optelnow.net (Kevin Cline) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: memory leakages with Ada? Date: 17 Mar 2002 19:52:36 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: <3c90af1e@news.starhub.net.sg> <3c91bfa3.1987537@news.demon.co.uk> <3C921A81.9060708@mail.com> <3C94463A.6040203@mail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.219.81.150 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1016423557 16103 127.0.0.1 (18 Mar 2002 03:52:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Mar 2002 03:52:37 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21390 Date: 2002-03-18T03:52:37+00:00 List-Id: Hyman Rosen wrote in message news:<3C94463A.6040203@mail.com>... > Kevin Cline wrote: > is that it is more easily debugged because the crash is immediate. > > Any code that keeps invalid pointers around, whether null or not, is > > poorly crafted. > > You don't terminate your linked lists? That wasn't really on my mind, since it's been such a long time since I've needed to reimplement the linked list. How many linked list implementations does the world need?