From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.50.119.5 with SMTP id kq5mr12180017igb.1.1407788897285;
        Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.25.50 with SMTP id 47mr1399qgs.42.1407788897201; Mon, 11
 Aug 2014 13:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!h18no18376678igc.0!news-out.google.com!b3ni24360qac.1!nntp.google.com!j15no6348985qaq.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <lsb8c3$kk7$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=206.53.78.59;
 posting-account=ShYTIAoAAABytvcS76ZrG9GdaV-nXYKy
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.53.78.59
References: <c4qn4nFbplvU1@mid.individual.net>
 <fec9c4a0-7084-431b-8071-7ae6910d823f@googlegroups.com>
 <lsb8c3$kk7$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <dc5f172b-0651-41e0-bf97-0f441b966f47@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Accessibility check failed
From: sbelmont700@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:28:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21669
Date: 2014-08-11T13:28:17-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, August 11, 2014 4:17:07 PM UTC-4, Jeffrey Carter wrote:
> 
> No, lifetime is until Main returns. Main can be withed and called from something 
> 
> else, or call itself recursively, possibly indirectly, so this is treated as 
> 
> having a lifetime less than forever even if we know it will be around for the 
> 
> life of the program.
> 

I suppose the better comment would be: "pass, lifetime is long enough"