From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9bbfb8cd49f1a51
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!oleane.net!oleane!in2p3.fr!irazu.switch.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!cern.ch!news
From: Maciej Sobczak <no.spam@no.spam.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Isn't this in favour of Ada??
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:29:15 +0200
Organization: CERN - European Laboratory for Particle Physics
Message-ID: <dbqe9b$a9n$1@sunnews.cern.ch>
References: <42d64dde$0$64794$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk>
 <dbo7se$ab0$1@sunnews.cern.ch>
 <42e0a2a6$0$36943$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: abpc10883.cern.ch
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sunnews.cern.ch 1122024555 10551 (None) 137.138.37.241
X-Complaints-To: news@sunnews.cern.ch
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050524 Red Hat/1.7.8-1.1.3.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <42e0a2a6$0$36943$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3726
Date: 2005-07-22T11:29:15+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Erlo Haugen wrote:

> What i meant to say was that Ada already has the features

Yes, I understand this. But standardizing threading features in other 
languages means simply that Ada can lose its competetive edge in this 
very aspect (portability of concurrent programs). That's why I don't 
really think that the article in question is "in favour" of Ada.


-- 
Maciej Sobczak : http://www.msobczak.com/
Programming    : http://www.msobczak.com/prog/