From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.36.19.193 with SMTP id 184mr1867255itz.48.1510847747779; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 07:55:47 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.85.67 with SMTP id h3mr91959oti.10.1510847747684; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 07:55:47 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.kjsl.com!usenet.stanford.edu!i6no234758itb.0!news-out.google.com!x87ni746ita.0!nntp.google.com!d140no343959itd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 07:55:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:191:8303:2100:5985:2c17:9409:aa9c; posting-account=fdRd8woAAADTIlxCu9FgvDrUK4wPzvy3 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:191:8303:2100:5985:2c17:9409:aa9c References: <2be64a8b-5f89-414c-9dcd-433bd5d855a0@googlegroups.com> <97915524-04a8-4954-8ed8-058ad63f529e@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Alleged GNAT bug From: Robert Eachus Injection-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 15:55:47 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48933 Date: 2017-11-16T07:55:47-08:00 List-Id: On Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 6:35:42 PM UTC-5, Randy Brukardt wrote: =20 > Please don't confuse people. 3.10.2 (accessibility rules) is the Heart of= =20 > Darkness. See AARM 3.10.2(3.b/3). (I'm serious.) I'd include the whole 3.10.2 Static Semantics section. It is amazing how m= uch verbiage is required to correctly state what was originally assumed to = be an implicit result of static nesting. Allowing an access type to design= ate a more deeply nested type is clearly wrong. The problem is all in defi= ning 'more deeply.'