From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: fdb77,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: Dan.Pop@cern.ch (Dan Pop) Subject: Re: How big is an int? (was: Yet another stupid language war (was: ... the only languages you need!!)) Date: 1997/11/19 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 290780946 References: <879381995snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> <879713346snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> <879900529snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> X-Complaints-To: news@sunnews.cern.ch X-Trace: sunnews.cern.ch 879959997 5556 (None) 137.138.32.79 Organization: CERN European Lab for Particle Physics Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java.advocacy Date: 1997-11-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In <879900529snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> fred@genesis.demon.co.uk (Lawrence Kirby) writes: # In article Dan.Pop@cern.ch "Dan Pop" writes: # # >And the definition of "unspecified behaviour" is: # > # > * Unspecified behavior --- behavior, for a correct program construct # > and correct data, for which the Standard imposes no requirements. # # No, the wording is as I quoted above, at least in the ISO 9899-1990 # standard. I was quoting from my copy of the draft. I wasn't aware that this changed in the final version. Dan -- Dan Pop CERN, IT Division Email: Dan.Pop@cern.ch Mail: CERN - PPE, Bat. 31 1-014, CH-1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland