From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f868292008c639ce X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Dale Stanbrough Subject: Re: C vs. Ada - strings Date: 2000/06/04 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 630766226 References: <390F0D93.F835FAD9@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> <8en5o9$ihe$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8eonos$e70$1@wanadoo.fr> <1fIU4.4668$Rx3.250161@typhoon.nyroc.rr.com> <3924B730.AFB52C1C@acenet.com.au> <4hc_4.2223$Md1.63965@news.flash.net> <3939602B.677BF4FF@telepath.com> X-Trace: 4 Jun 2000 11:12:07 +1000, r1021c-02.ppp.cs.rmit.edu.au Organization: RMIT User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-06-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison wrote: > That'd be quite a stretch, as its a reserved word. You might as well say > "type" > ... "is" is a function call. I would disagree, as there are implied semantics for "new", but none for "type". The matter is irrelavent though, as static calls to "new" can be optimised away to preallocated memory (this was mentioned in c.l.a. some 6 - 12 months ago). Dale