From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c197e893ca74cfe
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dale <dale@cs.rmit.edu.au>
Subject: Re: ada on linux
Date: 2000/05/24
Message-ID: <dale-9CCC2C.14305924052000@news.rmit.edu.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 626573395
References: <DZLN4.3054$r3.24201@news2.tor.primus.ca>
 <slrn8ilgih.daa.whraven@raven.wri> <8gffph$ft3$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Trace: 24 May 2000 15:30:40 GMT, dale.cs.rmit.edu.au
Organization: rmit
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-05-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar wrote:

> A bit of an odd division! But in any case I know of no
> proprietary Ada 95 compilers on Linux.

I just looked up the word "proprietor" in the dictionary and it says

   "person having property, owner"

By this meaning I would have said that the FSF is the proprietor of 
Gnat, and therefore there is such a compiler on Linux.

...or have I got something wrong here?

Dale